Todays Exchange rate 1US Dollar = 2,512.5257 Syrian Pounds


Fwd: Op de bres voor vluchtelingen (click to play)



transmigranten in 1946 (vanuit Frankrijk naar Brits gebied)


Zoek de verschillen tussen toen en nu…



from: The Guardian    27 October 2021

Moves to control the movement of refugees in Europe – archive, 1946 

Seventy-five years ago, France and the UK were looking at ways to restrict the movement of displaced persons, notably Jews, from central Europe 

From the Guardian archive – Refugees – compiled by Richard Nelsson

The “illegal” immigrant: France’s proposal

From our own correspondent
8 November 1946

Paris, 7 November
A Foreign Office spokesman this afternoon made some comments on the problem of Jews trying to pass through France from central Europe to Palestine.

The French government has sent a Note to the British and United States governments proposing the formation of a joint sea-power organisation to control the movement of displaced persons, notably Jews, from central Europe. The Note, which was transmitted on 31 October, follows on a French decision to send back a trainload of Jews from the American zone which arrived at the French frontier last week. None of the passengers had either visas or passports.

In French official quarters it is believed that it is largely the Jews who crossed into France clandestinely without any papers or authorisation that are likely to provide a source of illegal immigration into Palestine. These it is extremely difficult to control. The number of German prisoners escaping from France into Germany appears to be considerable, and no doubt it is equally easy to make the journey in the opposite sense. The present proposal is an attempt to satisfy the needs of the British authorities, who have recently drawn the attention of the French government to allegations that passengers to Palestine are leaving from a camp outside La Ciotat near Marseille.

Jews entering legally
The French have already established severe control of those of the Jews who enter France legally. At present they allow a maximum of 8,000 Jews in transit to reside in France, 7,000 travelling collectively and 1,000 individually. These have to prove that they can procure immigration permits into some country other than France before they are allowed to enter. The Federation of Jewish Relief Organisations is made responsible for them. They are housed either under UNRRA’s [United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration] supervision or in Jewish hostels. A group of such Jews who had entered France legally were recently turned back by the French authorities when they tried to embark in a Greek ship with false Ethiopian papers. It would appear, however, that those who have entered legally are only the smaller part of the problem.

The difficulty that the French government has in formulating a long-term policy in connection with displaced persons in Germany, both Jewish and others, is an interesting proof of the difficulty in the way of putting into practice either promise of asylum contained in the preamble to the French constitution or a policy of immigration to satisfy France’s need for extra population.

France’s need of miners
Although plans are on foot to import 20,000 miners from Italy, and possibly to make some German prisoners of war desirous of prolonging their stay in France, there is no scheme for using displaced persons from Germany to increase the French population. In the case of Jews, the main difficulty Is that they do not some into the categories of labour which France mainly requires – namely, miners and farm hands. With regard to other categories of displaced persons, the difficulty is the communists’ objection to all those whose refusal to go home is in fact based on dislike or fear of the Soviet Union.

Britain’s request to France

From our diplomatic correspondent
7 November 1946

No reply has yet been received from the French Foreign Office to the British suggestion that two Jewish refugee camps near Marseille should be moved father inland because there is evidence that illegal immigrants are leaving these camps for Palestine. Inmates of these camps are said to have reached the port by UNRRA lorries and then taken out to the immigrant ships. If the French government agrees the illegal immigrants may find it more difficult to embark.

Illegal immigration can obviously not be stopped by such methods alone, because the Jews are not only accustomed to overcome obstacles but many are uncompromisingly determined to reach the land of their hopes. Whether the journey to Palestine takes months or years, whether they face internment or delays, they are unlikely to stop trying to get to Palestine. After their experiences the time factor has lost its value to them.

Editorial: something wrong

29 October 1946

The British government, if one can judge from recent indications, has achieved one remarkable feat which was certainly not in its election programme: it has contrived to ignore as far as possible what is happening in Palestine and to forget completely the Jews who still remain in Europe. In this ignoble course it is being followed by most of the Labour party, the House of Commons, and the country at large. Indeed, by one of those peculiar acrobatics which so infuriate foreigners, we have convinced ourselves that if there is anything wrong (which we do not for one moment admit) not only are we entirely innocent but in fact it is we, and not the Jews, who are the injured party. Any criticism of our policy in the United States is, of course, nothing but the lowest kind of politics. Any complaint from Russia is inspired by a with to embarrass us in the Middle East. If the Jews themselves revolt, that is obviously the basest ingratitude. Besides, what more do they want? Have we not promoted General Barker out of Palestine?

But this attitude will not do. It is true that British policy has been grossly misrepresented, especially in the American press. It is true that the problem of Palestine is not nearly so easy as it seems to President Truman and that the Arabs have rights which cannot be ignored. It is even true that the Jews can be very tiresome. But these things should not blind us to the complete failure of our policy in Palestine or lead us to forget the scores of thousands of Jews who are still living in camps in Germany, Austria, and Cyprus.

It should not be necessary at this stage to remind people of the basic facts. These are simple enough. An a result of Hitler’s persecution between five and six million Jews in Europe lost their lives. Of the remainder, nearly all of whom suffered personally or by the loss of their families, about 500,000 now wish to leave Europe. Many of them live in countries, like Poland, where antisemitism is still widespread and where pogroms have taken place since the liberation. Nearly 100,000 live in camps in Germany and Austria because they have no homes, no possessions, and nowhere to go. In the words of the Anglo-American report, “these men, women, and children have a moral claim on the civilised world.”

So far, however, that claim has not been met. No country has offered to find homes for more than a fraction of these people. It is true, of course, that the Jews are themselves only a part of the greater number of “displaced persons” who also most be resettled elsewhere, but it is absurd to say that they should not have priority. The Poles, Balts, and Ukrainians are, for the most part, deserving people who should be given an opportunity to live and work in peace and freedom, but they have not been persecuted for fifteen years (not to mention fifteen hundred years), and they are not the survivors of a terrible massacre. Many of them passed the war pleasantly enough behind the German lines. With the Jews it is different. If the United Nations cannot help them quickly, then indeed humanity is failing. Most of the Jews, if given a choice, would go to Palestine, which they regard as their own country and where alone they believe they could live a normal life. But if they cannot go to Palestine (and clearly they cannot all go) they must go somewhere else. Since it is the British government which is preventing them from going to Palestine, it is surely for the British Government to take a lead in finding alternative homes.

– – –

= = =


Su 31 Oct 20:00 – Precaristas, film documentary € 0,00 31 October Start: 20:00 Doors: 19:30 at Muganga’s

living in fear

Linkse liefde, Afghanistan en meer

Linkse liefde

the white rider

(Het leuke van … is weten op reis te zijn

The Panjshir Valley 1980-86


Mark Galeotti posted: ” I’ve just had my advance copies of my latest Osprey book on the Soviet war in Afghanistan, The Panjshir Valley 1980-86, in their Campaign series – it’s out on 28 October and available for pre-order. Here’s the blurb: When the Soviets rolled in”


RHSS#8 Workshop, September 13, 2021: Russia’s Risk-Opportunity Calculus Evolution and Policy Response Implications

Mark Galeotti posted: ” This is a summary of the discussion at the concluding workshop of the current series of online Russia Hybrid Seminar Series (RHSS) webinars held on 13 September 2021 by the George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies (GCMC) in Garmisch-Pa”

demo flyer new camp on Samos… (show your disagreement!) (click to open the flyer)

Flyer English

Samos calling! Thanx again!

Onderwerp: Re: jarig



Hoera, je leeft en je bent jarig. Je wordt nota bene 65.
Je hebt bijna alles, maar nog veel te wensen en te geven.
Vandaar dat ik je uitnodig om een tientje beltegoed te doneren aan Samos Calling, zodat de jongens en meisjes in het vluchtelingenkamp Vathy een beetje kunnen internetten en communiceren met de family en de rest van de wereld.

Please, maak een tientje over op:
NL53 TRIO 0338 5736 07 t.n.v. Stichting Migrant 2 Migrant, o.v.v. Samos Calling

…en volg het verhaal op Feestboek Samos Calling en

Jo van der Spek
stichting M2M
radio Patapoe

Lancering Biopolder, GEM overtreedt wet en Boterbloem tekent

Nieuwsbrief 35 | 5 september 2021 |
Bekijk de webversie
Behoud Lutkemeer zet zich in om de Lutkemeerpolder te behouden voor de stad Amsterdam. Ook steunen?  Deel deze nieuwsbrief en houd onze website en facebookpagina in de gaten voor activiteiten, demonstraties en oproepen.
English summary below
Lancering Biopolder
Donderdag 9 september 17.30
Het plan Biopolder Lutkemeer is afgelopen maanden nieuw leven ingeblazen. Samen met verschillende partijen is het voorstel verder uitgewerkt en financieel onderbouwd. Komende maanden trekken we de stad in met een gedegen voorstel en breed draagvlak. Op zoek naar politieke steun. Daarnaast zal binnenkort in samenwerking met Stichting Grond van Bestaan een actie starten om samen de grond te kunnen kopen. Houd de berichtgeving in de gaten.
Meehelpen? Graag! We zoeken nog dringend mensen die de online campagne willen ondersteunen. Daarnaast is uitbreiding van het ambassadeurs-netwerk altijd welkom.
Online volgen (of terugkijken) van de lancering kan via de facebookpagina van Biopolder Lutkemeer.
Meer weten? Zie ook (onder constructie)

GEM overtreedt de wet met onrechtmatige ontruiming
Al sinds de actie in mei dit jaar, is er een stuk terrein gekraakt waar een tent staat en vanwaaruit verschillende informatie en protestacties plaats vinden. Het terrein is in eigendom van de GEM BV (Een BV van gemeente Amsterdam en SADC samen, waar de grond in onder is gebracht), maar ligt buiten het bouwterrein fase 1. Op die plek zijn nog geen concrete voornemens voor bouwwerkzaamheden.
Nadat tijdens het klimaatkamp allerlei bouwmateriaal, meubilair en gereedschap de container in is verdwenen, is er een schrijven gekomen dat ook de tent weggehaald moest woorden. Hier is protest tegen aangetekend door verschillende mensen die gebruik maken van de plek. Via een advocaat hebben zij laten weten dat er geen dringende reden is voor de GEM om het terrein te gebruiken en da zij zich beroepen op het recht van protest.De GEM heeft dit volkomen genegeerd en is op maandag 30 augustus overgegaan tot ontruiming. De tent is met een kraan verwijderd en afgevoerd. Samen met de advocaat wordt nu gekeken naar de volgende stappen. Maar dat de gemeente Amsterdam via haar BV de wet overtreedt is duidelijk.

Boterbloem alweer ‘gered’? De strijd gaat door!

Deze week liet de gemeente Amsterdam voor de zoveelste keer trots weten dat zij de geliefde biologische akkerbouwboerderij De Boterbloem heeft ‘gered’.
Behoud Lutkemeer is ook blij dat de boerderij – het gebouw, dat ze nota bene zelf gebouwd hebben-, en de oude boomgaard behouden zijn gebleven. Maar we weten ook dat de bruikleenovereenkomst met Trijntje en Erik, die daar al hun leven lang boeren, is aangeboden onder zware druk en na jaren traineren.

De boerderij is behouden, maar de akkers zijn ze voor het grootste deel kwijt. Die behoren immers tot het deel van de Lutkemeer dat het stadsbestuur wil volbouwen met grijze dozen voor multinationals. Albert Heijn zou de eerste klant zijn, daar is jarenlang geheimzinnig over gedaan. Op 5 ha wil Ahold een distributiecentrum bouwen, maar heeft nog steeds geen definitief contract getekend. Van de 11 ha die De Boterbloem in gebruik had, blijven er twee over, die ze moeten delen met stadslandbouwprojecten ‘Pluk’ en ‘Tuinen van West’..

Het contract dat de Boterbloem nu heeft gekregen, en waarvoor de bemiddeling van de Ombudsman ingeroepen moest worden, anders was het er niet gekomen, kent zelfs vernederende bepalingen. Zo mogen de boeren geen steun verlenen aan acties tegen het bedrijventerrein waar ze slachtoffer van zijn geworden. Ook is het contract slechts voor twee jaar, in principe kunnen ze daarna alsnog weggejaagd worden. En toestemming om te wonen krijgen ze niet, als onderdeel van het wegpestbeleid door de ambtenaren van Marieke van Doorninck (GroenLinks ja).

Kortom, blij dat ze ondanks al deze vernederingen en machinaties nog fier overeind staan, zijn wij van Behoud Lutkemeer vastberaden (en indien nodig ook heldhaftig, barmhartig waren we altijd al) om de verder strijd tegen de vernieling van de polder krachtig voort te zetten!

English summary
Plan Biopolder, an agro-ecological landscape park for the Lutkemeerpolder, has been revived. The launch will be streamed on Thursday 9 September on the Biopolder Facebook page. In the coming period we will look for political support for this plan. Soon a campaign will be launched in collaboration with the ‘Grond van Bestaan’ foundation to be able to purchase the land together.

The squatted site in the Lutkemeerpolder was illegally cleared by GEM BV last week. The users have engaged a lawyer and are discussing the action to be taken.

The municipality of Amsterdam proudly presented the rescue of organic farm De Boterbloem last week. Behoud Lutkemeer is happy that peace has returned for the farmers and that they can start building again. At the same time, we also know that the agreement was only forced after a very difficult period and through the persistent efforts of the Ombudsman. And the lease is for two years only. In addition, all fields have been surrendered and there is just two hectares of agricultural land left. We will continue to work for the preservation of the entire polder.

Doneer voor de Lutkemeer
De campagne en de juridische procedures kosten geld. Ook een steentje bijdragen? Doneer voor de Lutkemeer!
NL94 INGB 0007 2294 84 tnv Het Luchtkasteel ovv Behoud Lutkemeer
Geef je op voor alarmlijst
Als er gedreigd wordt met zandwagens en acute actie nodig is: geef je op voor de alarmlijst. mail je telefoonummer naar
Veel gestelde vragen over het verzet in de